Skip Navigation

Mathematical Medicine and Biology 2001 18(4):343-376; doi:10.1093/imammb/18.4.343
© 2001 by Institute of Mathematics and its Applications
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beil, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Wein, L. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Beil, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Wein, L. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Analysis and comparison of multimodal cancer treatments

Damian R. Beil1 and Lawrence M. Wein2

1 Operations Research Center, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA 2 Sloan School of Management, MIT Cambridge, MA 02139, USA

We analyse the sequence in which the three most commonly prescribed cancer treatments—surgery (S), chemotherapy (C) and radiotherapy (R)—should be administered. A system of ordinary differential equations is formulated that captures the various local and systemic effects of the three modes of treatment, as well as the first-order effects of the inter-relationship between the primary tumour and the distant metastatic tumours, including primary tumour shedding and the primary tumour's effect on the rate of angiogenesis in the metastatic tumours. Under a set of stated assumptions on the parameter values, we find the exact cancer cure probability (subject to toxicity constraints) for the six permutation schedules (i.e. SCR, CSR, CRS, SRC, RSC, RCS) and for two novel schedules, SRCR and RSCR, that apply radiotherapy in disjoint, optimally timed portions. We show analytically that SRCR and RSCR are the two best-performing (i.e. highest cure probability) schedules among the eight considered. Further, SRCR is shown to be optimal among all possible schedules, provided a modest condition is satisfied on the delay of initial angiogenesis experienced by the patient's dormant tumours.

Keywords: cancer treatments; metastasis; dynamic modelling; queueing theory


Received 12 June 2001. Revised 20 September 2001.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.